We all recall the FDA and mainstream media gaslighting the public into believing there was no available treatment for the coronavirus. They laughed at those who believed in holistic methods or the parasite treatment Ivermectin. Social media platforms were strongarmed by the government to remove any post related to Ivermectin treatment, commentators who discussed successful treatment with Ivermectin were silences, and the FDA launched its own campaign to dispel “misinformation” that they are now admitting was true all along.
The FDA even posted a picture of a horse online, taunting COVID-deniers by saying they were taking a medication only intended for horses and livestock. “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it,” the FDA posted on social media platforms in August 2021. “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19,” another post read in April 2022.
“Never use medications intended for animals on yourself or other people. Animal ivermectin products are very different from those approved for humans. Use of animal ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans is dangerous,” FDA said a few years ago.
Yet, 101 separate studies on Ivermectin treatments for the coronavirus have shown that it is an effective treatment. Some sources even say that it has a 62% chance of reducing symptoms if taken early. Worse, the FDA approved ivermectin for human consumption back in 1996.
?BREAKING:
FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history.This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the… pic.twitter.com/HWYkkZLpoJ
— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) March 22, 2024
A group of doctors, who would have lost their careers for speaking out a few years ago, filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for blocking this effective treatment, which likely resulted in countless preventable deaths. “We’re suing the FDA for lying to the public about ivermectin,” said Dr. Mary Bowden, supported by Drs. Paul E. Marik and Robert L. Apter.
The FDA is now agreeing to remove all social media posts denying the effectiveness of ivermectin. Lawyers for the corrupt government agency deny that the FDA made any recommendations. “They were not mandatory. They were recommendations. They said what parties should do. They said, for example, why you should not take ivermectin to treat COVID-19. They did not say you may not do it, you must not do it. They did not say it’s prohibited or it’s unlawful. They also did not say that doctors may not prescribe ivermectin.”
Now, Dr. Bowden was forced to resign during the COVID-19 fiasco for speaking out against mRNA vaccines and pleading with the public that alternative treatments were available. She claimed that she successfully treated hundreds of patients, often with co-morbidities, and none were forced into hospitalization. Her work went directly against the narrative that the only way to “stop the spread” was to take the experimental vaccine, stay home, or wind up on a ventilator.
Simply removing social media posts does not seem like a sufficient sentence for what the government did. Their “misinformation” caused people to lose their livelihoods and, worse, caused unnecessary deaths. The FDA had known since at least 2015 that ivermectin was safe for human consumption, but they dismissed it as a veterinarian medication throughout the pandemic and promoted dangerous propaganda.
