It is time to examine all of America’s affiliates. Public money has been flowing to globalist agencies that override democracy and do not coincide with traditional American values or interests. We saw the extent of their reach during the pandemic with regulations shifted society. Unelected officials created rules for everyone to abide by, and member nations, their pawns who pay for the privilege of being overridden, are gaining control. The United Nations is a serious threat to our future.
Here’s another $5 billion humanitarian organization that works to reduce the population — The United Nations Population Fund (UNPF), the world’s largest provider of sexual and reproductive health programs. The United Nations developed a trust in 1967 to address the growing population’s economic implications.
Justice Ginsburg made it clear that the abortion decision Roe v Wade had NOTHING to do with women’s rights. It was all about reducing the population. The Democrats counted on manipulating that decision and calling it a woman’s right to kill the child within her. They manipulated the entire issue, counting on the gullibility of women and the women’s movement to convert eugenics into women’s rights. This was all part of this globalist agenda with Bill Gates’ father and the Rockefeller Foundation in the background.
President Lyndon B. Johnson and other leaders of the time supported humanitarian efforts to financially support the growing populations of undeveloped economies. Henry Kissinger penned the NSSM-200, subtitled “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” This document has been considered the United States’ stance on reducing the population for advanced economic stability. As Kissinger wrote:
“The U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries. That fact gives the U.S. enhanced interest in the political, economic, and social stability of the supplying countries. Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests of the United States.”
The agency provides contraceptives, other forms of birth control, and reproductive care for women throughout the world who cannot afford the services on their own. The UN has committed horrible atrocities in the process from forced sterilizations and influencing politics. The agency uses its financial pull in an attempt to create reform. You can find them protesting at every major pro-life event and calling upon nations to focus on “women’s rights.” No one sees the leverage and influence these globalist groups have over legislation, especially in smaller economies. When Zambia declined to legalize sodomy, for example, the United States withdrew funding and the HIV infection rate spiked 11%.
They’ve been having conferences on population control for over 100 years. The First World Population Conference was held in 1927, but the first UN-sponsored conference happened in Rome back in 1954 to “to exchange scientific information on demographic variables, their determinants and their consequences.” The next conference in Belgrade (1965) focused on altering fertility rates. By 1974 they developed a plan of action laid out in a report. Kissinger’s 1977 report touches on this aspect:
As Human Life Internation describes, there was a five-step process to government-implemented family planning.
This five-step process is closely modeled after military mission planning protocols:
Less Developed Countries (LDCs) were seen as a threat to US national security. Population growth amid a stifled economy led to widespread poverty and instability. The US did not want the threat of political instability from its trading partners who had needed items like natural resources.
As Kissinger explains:
“There is also the danger that some LDC leaders will see developed country pressures for family planning as a form of economic or racial imperialism; this could well create a serious backlash.…The U.S. can help to minimize charges of an imperialist motivation behind its support of population activities by repeatedly asserting that such support derives from a concern with (a) The right of the individual couple to determine freely and responsibly the number and spacing of children and to have information, education, and means to do so; and (b) The fundamental social and economic development of poor countries in which rapid population growth is both a contributing cause and a consequence of widespread poverty.”
These humanitarian masked agencies are heavily supported by the left. The left believes it is our duty to shape foreign societies as they see fit. The biggest players in the public spotlight strongly support these globalist agencies and population control — i.e., George Soros, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab. These people truly believe they can control all of us. And our elected leaders send these groups money? END GLOBALIST FUNDING NOW!
The UN, USIA, and USAID are using funds to control the global population. You, as an American or a citizen of any developed nation, are paying into these NGOs with ulterior agendas. A portion of our population, a very vocal portion, believes it is essential to fund the progressive agenda. These agencies act as the brute strength. A wealthy nation could not openly meddle in such a manner, so those nations use these international agencies to promote their agendas.
