European Union nations are concerned about Trump’s victory, as Trump has historically opposed the NATO alliance siphoning funding from the US. Before Trump, only a handful of nations were paying their 2% of GDP obligation. World leaders are now calling for a European army, but a plan is already in place for a unified army that NATO could rapidly deploy.

Now, EU nations host multinational armies of 1,500 troops and have had them in place since 2007, yet they have never been deployed. France famously vetoed plans for a unified European army, but President Macron is now open to creating one. The Baltic nations also oppose a unified EU army as they believe it will decrease NATO’s strength. The UK once vetoed the proposal as well when they were within the bloc.

“If we do not start thinking about ways to organise our common defence, we will not be strong enough when we need to defend ourselves, or our neighbours,” voiced Polish leader Luc Frieden. Poland became the top contributor to NATO in terms of GDP after Russia invaded Ukraine.

“At the beginning, we should go ahead with a coalition of the willing. A few countries that are ready to pool their sovereign rights to be more efficient in defence.” He added, “Of course, each country will want to keep control over important decisions such as when to activate its army, when to send its soldiers to war. But it is also obvious that the current situation does not offer the level of security that we need. So, we need to start thinking about a European army.”

How could an effective military strategy be developed if each nation were acting independently? It simply would not be effective. Still, the EU is creating a Rapid Deployment Capacity (RDC) force that some are calling a “European Army.”

The first RDC exercise took place last month in Spain, with the cooperation of nine EU members and 2,800 military personnel. The EU believes that by next year, it will have 5,000 troops within the RDC who can deploy at a moment’s notice.

NATO has eight multinational brigades with 300,000 troops who could be ready for deployment within 30 days, and it has the capacity to expand to 500,000 if needed.

Trump does not want America involved in endless wars, yet he is inheriting 2.5 proxy wars.

The extremists in the Democratic party not only hate Trump, but they vehemently hate his supporters. In the wake of back-to-back hurricanes, the people of Florida relied on FEMA for emergency assistance, which the agency provided with federal funds. It has come to light that an employee canvassing properties in Lake Placid, Florida, ordered workers to bypass homes with Trump-Vance signs.

“Avoid homes advertising Trump,” FEMA supervisor Marn’i Washington advised her employees in a Microsoft Teams chat. FEMA workers overlooked at least 20 homes, noting, “Trump sign no entry per leadership.” Washinton has since been fired but her actions are nothing short of a political hate crime.

Governor Ron DeSantis has ordered an official investigation. How was this permitted and why didn’t anyone report her? How many homes were truly overlooked? “The blatant weaponization of government by partisan activists in the federal bureaucracy is yet another reason why the Biden-Harris administration is in its final days,” DeSantis posted to X.

FEMA claims this was an isolated incident. FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell insists that FEMA is dedicated to helping all survivors “regardless of their political affiliation.” “This was reprehensible. I want to be clear to all of my employees and the American people, this type of behavior and action will not be tolerated at FEMA and we will hold people accountable if they violate these standards of conduct,” Criswell stated. Criswell must appear before the House Oversight Committee Chairman  James Comer on November 19.

Let us not forget that FEMA consistently “misplaces” funds, and Republicans voted against providing the agency with additional funds. The courts must learn if this was truly an isolated incident or if others also ordered their employees to leave conservatives to rot amid dire tragedy. Yet another incident that shows how far the extremists on the left will go. A portion of the country doesn’t believe the other has a right to exist, which is precisely why the nation is beginning to fragment.

We were led to believe that conservative voices were the fringe minority across the United States. Trudeau in Canada used “fringe minority” to ostracize those who disagreed with him, and other nations will soon see that their people have also lost all confidence in their governments and will demand change.

Over 73 million Americans spoke with their vote this November and shocked the establishment by proving they disagree with their agenda. The media would like us to believe that Trump supporters are “deplorable,” “Nazis,” and “fascists” who are full of hate. They used divisive political rhetoric to make us see our neighbors as the problem rather than the government.

Trump supporters were demonized alongside him and forced into hiding for the past four years. People were genuinely worried about openly supporting Donald Trump. Look at the map above. There are not many indeed BLUE states, but rather, a bunch of big cities that want to tell the rest of America how to live. Americans are rejecting woke ideology, endless wars, endless government spending, and taxation, and yes, we noticed that our current president was mentally unfit for the job. Again, for the past four years, most Americans have secretly been questioning the direction of this nation and the Build Back Better agenda. Conservatives may now come out of hiding.

Commentary by Kerry Lutz:

The 2024 election has ended with Trump winning decisively, and now Kerry and Martin Armstrong reflect on the implications of this outcome. Armstrong, who had previously predicted Trump’s victory based on economic trends, discusses the left’s response, marked by disbelief and protests. He also analyzes how political infighting and criminal charges against Trump backfired, leading to a stronger position for him and the Republican platform. Armstrong highlights that Trump’s return will likely bring immediate changes, including swift policy reversals in foreign and domestic agendas, particularly around immigration, economic reforms, and an emphasis on de-escalating overseas conflicts. The conversation extends to the international stage, with Armstrong noting the shift in global sentiment against long-standing Western policies, particularly NATO’s role in global conflicts. Armstrong predicts that neoconservatives may attempt to counter Trump’s agenda, especially his desire to end U.S. involvement in international wars. He foresees challenges in reining in national debt and suggests a shift toward tariffs and less borrowing. Armstrong emphasizes the potential for a major economic reset as the public turns away from “socialist” and “neo-Marxist” influences, with the decline of these ideologies expected to complete around 2037.

A new report by Oxfam, “Climate Finance Unchecked,” has determined that the World Bank has $41 billion in unaccounted funds that were destined to fight climate change.

This figure represents 40% of all disbursed climate funds by the World Bank. Oxfam’s audit revealed that between 2017 and 2023, between $24 billion and $41 billion simply went unaccounted for and there is absolutely no record of where the money went. No one knows how the money was used as there is no paper trail revealing where the money went.

“The Bank is quick to brag about its climate finance billions —but these numbers are based on what it plans to spend, not on what it actually spends once a project gets rolling,” said Kate Donald, Head of Oxfam International’s Washington D.C. Office. “This is like asking your doctor to assess your diet only by looking at your grocery list, without ever checking what actually ends up in your fridge.”

The World Bank is a leader in climate finance, controlling 52% of the total flow from all multilateral banks combined. World Bank President Ajay Banga announced in December that the bank achieved 35% of its financing three years ahead of schedule. He then set a new target of 45% by 2025. The bank later said in September that it achieved 44% of climate financing to the tune of $42.6 billion. “We’re putting our ambition in overdrive,” Banga said.

The bank acknowledged that it was difficult to keep track of its 800 climate financing projects but offered no insight into the missing funds. “It is clear that no one — including the Bank — has any real idea of how many billions of dollars are going to which climate actions,” the Oxfam report said.

Yet, climate activists are demanding $5 trillion in ANNUAL financing for the Global South to pay toward climate debt. Where did the $41 billion go? That large of a sum simply cannot be lost in a mere paperwork or oversight error. The climate change agenda has become a slush fund for the elite who will continue to fund this agenda without taking any responsibility for where the funds go or if they’re actually altering the climate in any meaningful way.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. may now Make America Healthy Again. One of his first measures will be removing “an industrial waste product” from America’s water supply that has been deliberately added since 1945.

On January 25, 1945, Grand Rapids, Michigan, began water fluoridation. By 1960, water fluoridation had reached 50 million households and doubled to 100 million by 1975. Why? The government began adding fluoride to the water based on a 1930s study that stated a small amount of NATURALLY OCCURRING fluoride could protect teeth from decay.

It is odd that the government does not force insurance companies to treat teeth as a medical expense. It is difficult to gauge if these measures have actually prevented tooth decay, as access to dental health is far greater now than it was when trials began in the 1930s and 1940s. Who is responsible for adding fluoride to the water? California, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, and South Dakota have state mandates requiring fluoridated water. Other states like Maine, Utah, and New Hampshire permit the public to vote. Water utilities companies are responsible for maintaining water fluoridation systems. The EPA has federal oversight over the process and set a maximum contaminant level for fluoride at 4.0 mg/L. The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 forbids the EPA from actually mandating fluoride or any additive substances to the water supply, but they do have oversight.

So what’s the problem? “On January 20, the Trump White House will advise all U.S​. water systems to remove fluoride from public water. Fluoride is an industrial waste associated with arthritis, bone fractures, bone cancer, IQ loss, neurodevelopmental disorders, and thyroid disease,” Kennedy posted on X. Kennedy believes that fluoride does not have a clear health benefit to the public, but it is responsible for causing an array of life-altering ailments.

https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1852907832884285708

On September 25, 2024, a federal court in California ruled against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in a case involving fluoride. The court said that current levels of fluoride violate the Toxic Substances Control Act. Judge Edward Chen declared that there is “substantial and scientifically credible evidence” that fluoride poses a serious health risk and emphasized concern over fluorides effect on the developing brains of infants.

“In all, there is substantial and scientifically credible evidence establishing that fluoride poses a risk to human health; it is associated with a reduction in the IQ of children and is hazardous at dosages that are far too close to fluoride levels in the drinking water of the United States,” the judge wrote in his ruling.

The National Institutes of Health’s toxicology program produced a study that found a correlation between fluoride and lower IQ in children.

“The NTP monograph concluded that higher levels of fluoride exposure, such as drinking water containing more than 1.5 milligrams of fluoride per liter, are associated with lower IQ in children. The NTP review was designed to evaluate total fluoride exposure from all sources and was not designed to evaluate the health effects of fluoridated drinking water alone. It is important to note, however, that there were insufficient data to determine if the low fluoride level of 0.7 mg/L currently recommended for U.S. community water supplies has a negative effect on children’s IQ.”

The CDC, American Dental Association, American Pediatric Association, and every BIG health agency would like to ignore these serious health risks. These organizations showed their hand during COVID and are not to be trusted. How can we possibly turn a blind eye to the blatant health crisis facing America when we have clear evidence that government agencies are permitting Americans to be poisoned? Kennedy’s health crusade could possibly help America lose its title of the least healthy nation in the developed world.

Reports are circulating that Donald Trump has asked Bibi to wrap up the war before his inauguration. Trump has been a strong opponent of perpetual wars, and he knows that America is obligated to support Israel.

Hamas leaders issued a statement saying that Donald Trump is obligated to “work seriously to stop the war of genocide and aggression against our Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, stop the aggression against the brotherly Lebanese people, stop providing military support and political cover to the Zionist entity, and to recognize the legitimate rights of our people,” Hamas added.

Hamas also stated that it will never submit to Israel or accept occupation. The “new US administration must realize that our Palestinian people will continue to resist the hateful [Israeli] occupation and will not accept any path that detracts from their legitimate rights to freedom, independence, self-determination, and the establishment of their independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was one of the first world leaders to congratulate Donald Trump on his victory, calling it a “fresh start for America” and “history’s greatest comeback.” Bibi ha visited Trump in Mar-a-Lago this past July and the two have a close relationship.

Despite his ties to Bibi, Trump is relentless in his America First policies. Trump recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital during his first term. Some are concerned that he will allow Israel to annex areas of the West Bank, a compromise that Hamas would never agree to. We have numerous players in this war now as well who may turn to America’s other enemies if backed into a corner. I do believe Trump will do his best to keep US troops out of the Middle East, but he is acquiring a nation that is currently backing two endless wars. His next steps will be crucial in determining the trajectory of both Israel and Palestine.